Best Movie Reviews

In the case of the film "Water for Elephants" I had many doubts and prejudices.

On the one hand – to see the like. Playbill insanely beautiful. Theme of the circus – attractive. Reese Witherspoon – a charming …

From the other – I felt that this is not "my" movie. Not something that can touch me. And incredibly embarrassed Pattison in the title role. I have it very biased attitude after the "Twilight." I realize this, and realize that it's wrong, but do nothing with them can not.

After viewing the film, I can safely say that my opinion about Robert Pattinson as an actor has changed for the better.

Articulated the idea that he is not a bad actor, but simply – pure and hostage incompetent image. Vampire Edward, in my opinion, more than once he goes around comes around to the acquisition of a serious actor status.

The guy can play. Stars from the sky is not enough, but what is surprising: against such a strong game as the game Christopher drum in the "Water for Elephants," Pattison looks good. Confrontation characters drum and Pattinson seems to me convincing, exciting, perezhivatelnym.

Name as you want, but in the confrontation in the conflict believe.

But Reese Witherspoon was not pleased. The result was what – even incomprehensible attempt to create an image of woman-dreams, flirt and martyr at a time. Messy and past music. " Not what you expect from such an actress. I recall a game Reese in "Walk on the line," for which she won an Oscar. That's "Walk on dash" – Reese Witherspoon – Actress from God, the actress, who is afraid of nothing, which is entirely given way, while maintaining its sustained, somewhat cold style of play.

In the "Water for Elephants" significantly interfered with her presence and drum, and Pattinson.

They are "suffocated" her role, and as a result have reduced it to a secondary status.

About any serious position of women in film and speech can not be!

Pale, dull, even a forced …

Perhaps the weakest component of the picture.

Sufficiently unpleasant surprise, since I am impressed Witherspoon as an actress, and I feel for her quite adequate share of respect.

Another noticeable problem was the fact that Witherspoon and Pattinson did not work out on the screen. Absolutely no "chemistry."

Like love, drama and kisses … but … artificially or something …

With the same pressure rollers – much more emotion and passion.

While here the role played by Waltz. Each frame of film, where it is present, look no stopping. Magic actor. Strength of the game – an incredible, sweeping down.

He had no doubts about who is the "first violin" actors.

Waltz.

It was he and he alone.

In general – the film a colorful, "juicy".

Surroundings, the atmosphere – the magic.

Flashy outfits, fabulous animals (which is an elephant Rosie!)

I, however, troubled by the timing operation.

Several prolonged, hence the explicit "slack" middle of the movie and "smearing" of the plot as the semolina on a plate.

The ending, in contrast, seemed crumpled and tangible "stained" the final impression, alas.

Solid four "Water for Elephants" still deserve.

To view the fully permitted.

At least, because to see what Pattison, it turns out, may play

Seriously!)))