Best Movie Reviews

I want to express their "financial".

I was expecting something magical, but it turned out – politikanskie strife. All dreams to take Davy Jones by the neck and instruct conditions, and therefore are chasing chest. In Lukyanenko, they're there or something, zadruzhilis?

The film is not for children, they simply do not understand, yes, and not for adults, by and large. Want a tale of swashbuckling pirates, beautiful governor's daughters and desperate daredevils, in combination, the smiths.

In short, remove from the scene all too much. I have a clear division of good and bad in children's films should not have to jump over your head, Kanayan psychological drama.

Add a tactical naval battles, as in the first part, and then a movie about pirates, but srazhenitse normal during the entire movie is only one, and that – small.

And it was not worth so lean on special effects, not quantity, but quality and individuality should be taking. Also seen in the movie storyline of Captain Blood, why? It was difficult for something new to think or just gained airtime in two parts instead of one?

Under all the funny moments necessary to sign a "see Part 1," that all may remember that we must laugh.

In short, the whole film an epilogue to the first and prerequisite to the latter, nothing of themselves are not reported.

Conclusion: watch all those interested in special effects and actors who played in the film, as well as those who do not have policies in life. Not recommended to look pregnant, children under 12 without their parents (there should be someone the question "why" answer), and those who have not seen the first part.

A few weeks ago I asked my piano teacher, which is older than I am only 10 years, as it relates to one of my favorite movies – Pirates of the Caribbean ". To my surprise, she replied: "I've never looked. And that, he deserves all the praise that I heard about him?" I have a few seconds, I changed my mind about the answer and then said simply: "Pirates of the Caribbean – a classic."

Yes, I did not dare say it – classic. This film, despite the fact that he was born relatively recently, has already entered the golden fund of world cinema. And not just because he has revived the pirate movie genre, but also because since the inception of cinema, no audience has not seen anything like it.

In "Pirates of the Caribbean" has absolutely everything that can boast of adventure: they adventure, intrigue, a fascinating plot, scale, spectacle, romance, fierce fights, car chases, humor, beautiful scenery and music, on which is breathtaking.

Gore Verbinski has created an amazing world that every kid dreams of, though he did not leave indifferent and little girls too. After all, life is a pirate – is primarily a freedom, but is there a man she does not appeal?

But this movie would have been the half was not as good without the genius of Johnny Depp. In his comments to the film 18-year-old Keira Knightley said: "He always pulls the blanket!" But it is quite natural, because it's his blanket! He – the center of the film, highlight it – the key to viewers' hearts. His inimitable gestures, demeanor, gestures, gait create a seamless and vivid image that he simply can not stock up at the memory. Johnny Depp plays the strange pirate so naturally, that begins to seem that he was Jack Sparrow in a past life. Still, after he had fashioned his hero, has thought his way to the last beads in her hair.

Of course, the rest of the cast pales against the backdrop of Depp. Worthy competition he could reach except that Geoffrey Rush and Barbossa, a pirate very different quenching. He is a classic buccaneer, not for nothing that his name is consonant with the names of two world-famous pirates – with the names of red-bearded brothers Barborossoy Barborossoy I and II. If Trump Dppa – eccentricity, the trump Rush – charisma.

But saying that the rest of the actors is impressive less than Depp, I'm not in any way meant that they failed in their roles.

Orlando Bloom plays on average, but he helps his handsome appearance, so that William LTL quite convincing.

Keira Knightley – my favorite actress. But her game I like only the first part of the pirate trilogy. In the first movie she is good, although I do not sympathize with her character.

Secondary roles executed with great skill, was particularly impressed by the Commander Norington and pirate crew.

I note that in the first part of writers' work is best done, as in the plot no of strain or artificiality. Just can not remember a great dubbing that Russian visitors are pampered infrequently.

I would not be surprised if in 30 years will remove the remake of this movie, and I'll convince their grandchildren that the old version is much better and Johnny Depp – the only way Jack Sparrow.

This is one of those films that you watch over and over again many times. And when once again I close my battered box with almost erased drive to the holes, then going to the kitchen to a drunken gait, Centerfolds, involuntarily imitating the protagonist, and poured himself some coffee, sing: "So let us drink a glass, yo-ho!"

Tonight I'll kill you all …

The Wolf Man (I love this movie)

Generally I'm very upset that this movie ruined a lot of feedback and reviews. I rarely read other people's reviews, because I am afraid of disappointment. Simply, many people write about the film, after how they look. And these people do not know the ground on which stands a particular film. Of course, the emotions have to pass, but the film seems to me that you need to know how the story. And when emotions take over the story, you get a real magic. And now of course a little bit about the film "The Wolf Man."

Before us is a remake of the paintings in 1941. Whoever wrote that is a complete remake of an old film, then surely he is mistaken, because the remake has turned out very arbitrary and many plotlines here reworked. Good or bad? I think that is normal, because now is the time more and of course cinema has also changed. Directed by Joe Johnston remake retained only the problem of the protagonist, and his as you know, was bitten by a werewolf. And yet the director tried to convey the atmosphere of an old movie, and I can say that this had happened a hundred percent. Virtually all the same thing as before, but only in color. Particularly pleased with dark wood.

Personally, I was hard to watch the original film, although he walked just one hour and two minutes. This film to me, too, was hard to watch, because we face a real drama, not a pure horror film. The protagonist realizes that he will kill anyone who is near him, so this story was originally can not end very well. And I am glad that the director did such a sad ending, because in the original film, too, ended sadly, but as they say is another story.

Actor Benicio Del Toro as a child went to black and white horror movies. He loved Lon Chaney Jr.. and other legendary actors, so it is not surprising that it took on a leading role in this film. He played the course as always great. In general, I think he's a bit like Lon Chaney Jr.. and sometimes it seemed to me that itself Lon Chaney Jr.. is present in the frame. Well, about Anthony Hopkins should not even talk. It's a pity that he so much older. And special thanks to the director for what he gave the play a very important role in the story – unprecedented actress Geraldine Chaplin. I am very glad that I live in an era of great actors.

As a result, we have a very dark and very heavy film, which will please not to all fans of horror. Although there is no surprise, since the old film is also not to everyone's taste. And personally I am glad to put this film the highest possible rating. I very much like movies about werewolves since childhood, and now in the film they are very rarely shown, so you need to appreciate what is there. Masterpiece.

Thank you.

10 of 10

Staring * The Wolf Man *.

Universal dominance in the genre of horror every man, mosquitoes, humans, larvae and other zoo's long and firmly discouraged by genre horor anyone who bothered to watch a masquerade ball flavored with ketchup. What distinguishes the human and the wolf from the above the pantheon?

That's right, Benicio Del Toro, actor and producer. Yes, he is not alone, the cast of the best advertisement for the film, frankly, most would simply have passed by, seeing the one name.

Hence the question, why in the movie, all these wonderful people, and especially Hugo Weaving. Let us explain the presence of Del Toro may be the fact of its producing, or vice versa. What sticks lured Hopkins and Weaving is not clear.

No less disturbing issue is the director, who belonged to the idea planted in a chair, who specializes in adventure films? Questions, questions may be true, does not matter who, the outcome is known and already on the big screen.

It seems that the film was shot on thrillers cookbook, strict adherence to the recipe:

If the thriller, you will surely grinding music, exploding in his ears at the right time. Of course, the right moment, can become even turning pages in books, not to mention the simple change of plan frame. If the thriller, the heroes must go darker clouds, actually the only emotions that we see in Del Toro, it's grin Wolf Man.

If in a thriller played Hopkins, it is his character will be constructed plot, and we will see his famous monologues, where he good-naturedly tells of the horrors of life. And you certainly will not escape from the fog, if it is a thriller, choose the place of England.

Strictly from textbooks directors, I am almost certain that they exist, every thriller should be removed in the dark faded tones, even the property room where the blood of the texture color to the earthen approaches (not to be confused with strawberry).

Accurately reproducing the above steps, the director can expect to part * Thriller * he coped with a clear conscience go to the genre Horor * *.

So, if you shoot horor about human-beast, you will need the following ingredients:

Creature, one thing (two if you want to plot), the girl one thing, it will fall in love all the protagonists, no matter what she spent on screen time, peppy smart inspector one thing, invite to the role of the famous dramatic actor and your Film acquire depth. Remember, the dots in the finals adds value to your movie.

Please do not remove it all as a video clip!

However, the latter obviously my fantasies, this line was not in the textbook. Perhaps it was not so sad, take off all of this director understands the sense of the need to create an atmosphere.

After viewing remained a whole series of rhetorical questions, ask them to void.

What are rushing across the sky clouds and the moon, pop-up like a ball, it speeds up the event and is not acting for the better. Where did all the general plans, why the characters, talking on the river, suddenly transferred to the estate is strictly valid in the scenario now. Why such a ragged assembly, the only worthwhile scene after the attack Werewolf in London, even if it resembles King Kong in the image of Spider-Man. Give enjoy the moment, you have no right to hurry with this flaccid script. If you really took to scare the viewer raschlenenkoy, so do not stint on the ketchup and squirted a brain should not be distracted by a dull plot and unsuccessful attempts to discharge the atmosphere.

Summary of the diagonal.

Sufficiently vulgar advertising campaign to lure visitors names of good actors in a mediocre film. Thriller fans will miss the entire film outside, fans horora – raschlenenki. Others may seem dull contemplation of low-intensity plot with little or no action.

All films are divided into two groups: those that thou shalt be reviewed and that you will not. From "Wolf Man" came out exactly the situation when a film review special desire is not observed. No, definitely not a bad film, it does not cause disgust as the recently released "Legion", but before the masterpiece "The Wolf Man" is far.

The "Wolf Man" all present, to create an excellent horror film: an old English mansion, black forest, the crypt, the legend of the werewolf, even computer graphics, the crutch of cinema, there is … But no matter how Stanislavski said: "I do not believe it!" Game actors unconvincing. Of course, with the exception of the beloved Benicio Del Toro (old Hopkins also did not disappoint). But they do not want to empathize, to them, to be honest, just do not care. Kill him, not kill – no difference. Well … no skips a spark. Music elusive and banal, I even thought I had heard it in some other film …

What about the names of horror. Very, very doubtful. There was a couple of scary moments … and all. Werewolves wonderfully grunting and generally look quite funny. Broken bodies, bare ridges, intestine do not cause emotions. Agent Smith, who introduced officers from Scotland Yard, too, smiled. The plot is so-so. I have not watched an old film, a remake of which is the "Wolf Man", but I think those who liked the old film will be liked and remake.

6 of 10

Middling.

Excellent movie. Only here can not be annoyed by Keira Knightley, has spoiled everything. Bloom played well. Depp, whatever you say, as always, is good.

A lot of fun moments, not counting the ending. When I saw "The end", I have, literally, jaw dropped.

The film is worth seeing …

Ps Just zashibitelny soundtrack.

9.5 out of 10.

Formula successful sikvelizatsii passing into trikvelizatsiyu, invented long ago the father of all things – George Lucas, the Demiurge of the Great trilogy. She is a formula, both simple and ingenious, so that even a surprise that the all-around do not do. Do not shoot great trilogy.

Most of the preference scheme of the ordinary prolongation – provided that the public swallowed their liquor, do not sobered up and will not abandon the proposal to slap another one. Something similar happened with Steven Sommerse – sobering public and its attendant symptoms akkurat happened to "Van Helsing." The audience, which danced on the tables, using a cocktail "The Mummy Returns", suddenly caught up with the desire to totally problevatsya after the adoption of the chest, "Transylvanian special." Satiety, a pancake.

More gifted directors – such as James Cameron – prefer to continue to rent, fully replacing the genre orientation. Not quite honestly, but it works – though only until the wits, who decides that a comedy – exactly the genre that will bring the series into a new orbit.

Totally different thing when a director in his head sits a sharp thorn thought in three parts. The second film may be like "Empire, causing a retaliatory strike" and "The Matrix: Reloaded." The latter option – no nonsense tragedy. It's better, by God, to be simple and even somewhat charming laughingstock.

Accidents and smoky funnel cases where the sequels do staging posts en route to the third part. When the desire to conquer the peak, or search for new (and why should she, he wondered, to conquer or to seek, if the viewer is already on the hook?) – Lost. Simply go the same way, only this time in the company of clowns from the big top or the front orchestra, than again to climb the steep and tempt fate. In short, it suffices to match – and the trick is done.

Sorry for stretching the opening preamble, but to know what is unique, "Dead Man's Chest" as a film-extension – is vital. In the first place to mitigate the explosion of impressions from the meeting.
What's in the "Pirates" remnants of the original? Just something a couple of things. Visual range still looks juicier than shown in television commercials fruit. It seems that the broadcast image comes from some other universe, where the palette is richer, any dust is not as a class, and all things look either freshly prepared or nobly antiquated.

But this – not all. In addition to succulence was added a healthy, reasonable fraction of the theatricality of the structure frame. Unobtrusive cameraman admiration simple household items – such as the cups in the rain – would not make a picture in a still life, and only adds to her life – believe me, no?

Better believe me, for life is real hard hits from the movie high geyser. And we're not on the local action-packed scenes, which, like the cost to assume, are worthy of inclusion in the platinum oldies. Although … Well, since I mentioned this topic of no small importance, we consider it more closely.

Only a local brick-busting action – not only to combine serious action with humor, but also in the duration of the scenes, during which the hearts of the audience relentlessly pounding aki mad, trying to jump out of the chest and fall down from the floor far away – in a more peaceful place. Really, surprisingly zaboristye cocktails are obtained from the local bartender. And one must be called something terribly brutal type wrench on temechku or there, say, "reinforcing a sup." Name, you know, must reflect the effect produced by the body.

What did the stunt coordinator and the operator during the break between the first and second film, we are even afraid to imagine. Well, that is, there is speculation – the operator of a billion and one revising the latest film by Alex Proyas ("I, Robot", loved Dunces "), constantly exclaiming:" Wow, e-my, did not know what you can do so, " and the main stuntman clearly not shied away from illegal herbs, zakinuvshih awareness of the disease in the transcendental region of huge rolling water wheels and flying men-kebabs.

As already mentioned, in addition to enthusiastic sob from the scope of almost any fantasy action-sequent can not look, do not parallel giggling like a real schizophrenic, pumped to the eyeballs laughing gas. Another tradition of the series, to do without it? That's just – I do not remember how much lasted the first duel of Jack and Will? Five minutes, right? And how about a quarter of an hour of nonstop Rubilovo whose members explicitly claim to be a presidential award for quality performance? Sure that your body will cope? If not – is it useful to work out a little. We recommend you do a show bar with a simultaneous reading Terry Pratchett. A similar effect with the film – guaranteed.

The truth is, if the worst happened, and "Dead Man's Chest" were cut to all okromya action, then it would be enough to melt the iron heart muscle expensive edition. But the apocalypse did not happen – the rest of the content is also ignites. According to the new, the special, piratically.

It turned out that predsemochny General Discussion may be concrete truth. What a, a pancake, surprise! Series really took a course on the do not bode well protagonists horizon. For example, they are heroes, somewhere lost their own, as it turned out, not very a precious positivity. Snapped everything – except, perhaps, an eternal hero-martyr of Will Turner. However, the role is clearly found the right destination – and the plot requires at least some character, other times just waiting for the equivalent neighbor put a pillow perdushki in a large scale.
Think, exaggerates, makes the microbe Tyrannosaurus rex? Certainly not.

Jack Sparrow no longer looks like a fine fellow, who sometimes goes to the dark side, but zavsegda remains true Jedi. No, this type is ready to go by printing step on the corpses. No, not even so – in the mountains of corpses. Speaking of which: Meet the new feature supposedly familiar faces – namely, that the mountains, namely, that the corpses. In the first film too was killed, but how would a make-believe (except, perhaps, of the macabre scene in "smashing") and "Dead Man's Chest" has literally cut the throats, and then looks at the audience an appraising look of Davy Jones. Choked on a pop, not stuck in the throat is popcorn? Oh, and then another? Well and good.

Of course, there were no casualties. In order to tell a story, submit new characters and old characters in a spicy sauce, almost all equidistant from the plot. Be brave – and Captain Jack Sparrow as well. So if you expected the sequel to the banal give you a double portion of beloved buccaneer with pickles, keep in mind – none of that.

Another thing is that to drop tears on this occasion it is not necessary, because the return is given a lot – luxury villain, chokes on the tragedy itself Barbossa, more pronounced on the premise that it should be regarded as a threat – sea monsters or a soulless people … And much, much more.

In conclusion, I want to say that, probably, director Gore Verbinski choice in the development of the franchise let's not easy. It is not excluded that some fans of the first part innovations seem too revolutionary and radical. Most likely, there are people, raskochegarennye rhythm of the narrative, which will be called the most stupid ending of the movie. One unexpected and totally unpredictable "Pirates" became the film is not for everyone.

But their fans still easy to distinguish from ordinary people. They are waiting for manic May next year, constantly whistling little changed Zimmer tune (though in fairness it is worth noting – there is a "Dead Man's Chest" are two very smart new songs!) And repeatedly go to the cinema on the same film.

How do we not know? After all, we – some of them.

9 of 10

Fearless and free, following his heart and the sea, treacherous and cruel, the pirates for centuries inspire fear in the civilian population of sea coasts. They declared themselves masters of the seas and established it own laws. They used to live as they please, spare no prisoners, and live happily. And they also gave rise to many exciting myths and legends, becoming one of the most romantic gangsters of all time. Now the pirates are synonymous with the dangerous adventures, which are so lacking in the common man, and that so captivates his exploits, battles, love stories and the ringing of golden coins. So, seeing the ship on the horizon with black sails, standing point of a sword and charge pistols – adventure will not take long to wait.

Directed by Gore Verbinski and the Disney studio one day decided to tell the viewer a fascinating story of those whose name is dangerous to call on the ship. The plot in a few minutes brings us to the UK since its sea power and gradually reveals the incredible secrets of the pirates, whose heart belongs only to correct the ship and the wind. Combining achievements of computer technology, superior game actors and realistic scenery, motion picture has become an excellent attraction 21st century.

- No bullets in reserve, no gunpowder … Compass does not show on the north … I've thought that a wooden sword. You are the most miserable of all the pirates that I've ever heard.

– But you heard about me. "

The protagonist of adventure, the one from whom all get in trouble, and from time to time to extricate himself from them, is seasoned pirates who used to call himself Captain Jack Sparrow. In search of his beloved "Black Pearl", he manages to make new friends and foes, drink rum, steal and drown more than one ship, and get a few slaps in the face – yes, a list of Jack's exploits is endless. He often has no luck in his pirate craft, but his talent for wrapping even the most hopeless case in their favor deserves respect. And the irony with which he includes all his troubles, always helps to survive. Talented Johnny Depp has created an image charismatic pirate, whose society is not frightening, but rather intriguing – because who knows what his Captain Jack Sparrow will come up with next. So bright a character immediately became the face of motion pictures, and humor, manners and mystique of this cunning hero helped to create an interesting story that can keep the viewer from the screen down to the final credits.

"- From pirates to associate – against my rules."

The absolute opposite of crafty Jack stands proud blacksmith Will Turner, has long yearned to fight with one of the sea bandits. His fiery temper and warm heart implicate the guy in such adventures, from which we can not get out alive. Acquaintance with Captain Will allow better know yourself, to test their will and become a hero who can be proud of the lady of his heart. Orlando Bloom played the character perfectly, giving it and reckless courage, and sincerity, and a serious love, and that led Mr. Turner to risk everything.

"- A woman on the ship – not good."

Many high-profile exploits occurred because of women, and this story is no exception. Not in vain the sailors have a rule not to take it on board – or to be trouble. And the trouble was not long in coming. Beautiful and young aristocrat with a wild heart, Elizabeth Swann is captured by cruel pirates, that's just it absolutely is not ready to surrender. Her strong character, ability to persuade and willingness to fight with anyone who gets in its way gives a lot of trouble as well as foes, and the British navy. Keira Knightley wonderfully realized his strong-willed character who knows how to cherish his hero, and undoubtedly would follow him to the edge of the world.

- You have to believe in legends about ghosts – you are among them. "

And what would life pirate viewers did not seem solid carefree adventure, writers have come up with an unforgettable character, a true sea storm. Captain Barbossa becomes a worthy opponent for the courageous trio, shows that in a world of pirates survive only the strongest, and the weak are food for sharks. Actor Geoffrey Rush played delightfully cruel, treacherous, selfish and domineering character who is not fortunate to become a victim of a longstanding curse.

Motion picture was the beginning of an exciting serial stories of robbers, whose home is the Caribbean. Gore Verbinski aptly chosen theme of his workmanship, created a large-scale film is not only about the adventures and exploits, but also disclose the nature of the characters, showing against the backdrop of a dynamic maritime race of their feelings – pure love, true friendship, genuine courage and boundless courage. Visual part of films is impressive no less subject turns. An attention to detail costumes, realistic scenery, high-quality computer graphics and magic music composer Klaus Badelt create an atmosphere revived the legend that is ready to fall in love and delight the viewer in a free life in the vast stormy seas.

- Take it all and not give anything! "

Choosing life pirate, worth remembering that the sea every man for himself. Because it is such a brave and smiling fluctuating fortunes.

Perhaps we should say that the movie I was expecting. Three years. But just last year, when "possible" issue, I firmly realized: the film intriguing and worth a look. Unfortunately, due to various disagreements, until the removal of the director of the project, a controversial situation, with many of his not very joyful nuances that doomed the film to obscurity. Ignorance. How many times have transferred out pictures, so many times I grieved. However, looking ahead, I will say that my expectations were justified. Off.

So, from watching a movie, I firmly believe: frustration will not follow. Moreover, all the anticipation, that I fed from the trailer, just attracted to her, forcing as quickly as possible to meet every day growing interest in the project, the actors, the storyline. Contrary to the views of some people who already looked a, I say: the film is definitely intriguing, fascinating for its scenery, opposition to the dark side of the personality, and perhaps not even one, shiny and not plaintive dialogue. The film does not suggests to the viewer a comprehensive and terrors, that his knees should tremble with fear, and a tooth for a tooth will not fall – far from it. Salt of the film, rather, in the confrontation of man with external challenges, obstacles, and, most frightening and horrible – with himself. Personally, I saw the sincerity in setting – from directing to a magnificent panorama of the UK at that time.

Human fears, gossip, rumors and legends are interwoven together when threatened with the lives of ordinary civilians. In the film, it is worth mentioning, there is still inherent in horror movies is a surprise and suddenness of the event, a dangerous moment. But, overall, the film looks at one go, without causing any "spectator panic and screaming in the hall. In other matters, it's everybody's (personally, I allowed myself a couple of times startled exciting moments, not necessarily unexpected). Besides, the plot is not so predictable that you can "tell all in advance for 30 minutes." None. Honestly, I forget about everything – for you, there is only one world of the main characters (which, incidentally, the director presented us with an interesting light). Cruelty on the screen is present, but not enough to say with certainty that it is man-wolf – is a real beast. Rather, bullying, ridicule, rebuke in poloumii hurts more than pity for these same people who, a few moments ago, plenty of mocking, in hysterics scatter in different directions. The Dark Side of the hero, which he considers a curse, not just the upper hand – in addition to loss of control, it appears, incurable.

Unfortunately, the original could not see, however, during the show feel that without hypocrisy, for sure, played an original 1941. At the head comes to mind: what if the truth, to find a movie and watch it, learn a moral. This, of course, classic horror films. Something, perhaps, will now look at oneself in sham, too pretentious. However, the remake, in my opinion, failed. In other matters, attracted by the fact that the maximum paid makeup characters. – A minimum of graphics, with a maximum of naturalism, acting, and naturally, the audience award. By the way speaking, was very pleased to observe the plasticity of the character, his actions, the actions of "live". And even if honest, I was glad concealed the fact that computer graphics, is still taking place in the picture, invisible eye, the real acting is interesting, makes love with the heroes, sometimes notice and sympathy for the characters, which occurs in the process of watching quietly and quickly .

Needless to say, apart from the film for the viewer creators saved up elegant end – who knows, maybe this is an allusion to continue? In any case, I want to say one thing: the film is not just liked, but delighted, pleased, certifying that really waiting for it for a reason. So without a shadow of doubt –

10 of 10

"Why here has revealed its polyps?" ©

If the movie ugrohano 225 million greenbacks, crispy dollars if the screen is carried, waving his hands and shoots through the eyes cutie Johnny Depp, if directed by Gore Verbinski talented and powerful music for the film he wrote himself, Hans Zimmer … What does this mean? Correctly, that the film is doomed to a mad success with viewers of any age category.

First of all, I want to say that a sequel almost as the first part of the trilogy. Well maybe just a little bit. After all, first impressions are the strongest, all new. In "Dead Man's Chest," simply enchanting scenery, and wants to "gasp". All sea-oceans, islands, frigate birds – the whole entourage simply incomparable. Perfect. Hot 'thank you' want to say make-up artists – did their best. That only costs one Trophy Prihlopa "Bill Turner. I'm not talking about other creatures. All the music and the soundtrack to match action unfolding on screen. Everything fits wonderfully. Special effects on an unusually high level. More precisely, on the brink of reality and fiction – would never have thought that computer graphics can practically materialize into reality. But it is precisely these feelings were viewing.

- Tell Ptah, you can live with that? "You condemn another person's eternal shackles, and he'll have fun, go out and drink?
– Mmm, yes. It's on me. "©

And now, some of the cast. I think everyone understands that if only the "Pirates" was not Johnny Depp, it would no longer "Pirates." Inimitable, rowdy-dowdy Jack Sparrow, played by Depp's talented – is a complete delight. As far as I know, many of the habits of his character Johnny invented himself. Hitryuschy squint eye veshchichki in hippie style, all those swinging hands and turns … well, just no words. Absolute genius. Against it pales all and all. In the film, remembered three more character "Prihlop Bill (Stellan Skarsgard), Davy Jones (Bill Nighy) and Tia Dalma (Naomie Harris). All other "floating" under the leadership of Depp.

- Thank you, merci, thank you! – I said, choking with happiness.

10 of 10