Best Movie Reviews

I want to express their "financial".

I was expecting something magical, but it turned out – politikanskie strife. All dreams to take Davy Jones by the neck and instruct conditions, and therefore are chasing chest. In Lukyanenko, they're there or something, zadruzhilis?

The film is not for children, they simply do not understand, yes, and not for adults, by and large. Want a tale of swashbuckling pirates, beautiful governor's daughters and desperate daredevils, in combination, the smiths.

In short, remove from the scene all too much. I have a clear division of good and bad in children's films should not have to jump over your head, Kanayan psychological drama.

Add a tactical naval battles, as in the first part, and then a movie about pirates, but srazhenitse normal during the entire movie is only one, and that – small.

And it was not worth so lean on special effects, not quantity, but quality and individuality should be taking. Also seen in the movie storyline of Captain Blood, why? It was difficult for something new to think or just gained airtime in two parts instead of one?

Under all the funny moments necessary to sign a "see Part 1," that all may remember that we must laugh.

In short, the whole film an epilogue to the first and prerequisite to the latter, nothing of themselves are not reported.

Conclusion: watch all those interested in special effects and actors who played in the film, as well as those who do not have policies in life. Not recommended to look pregnant, children under 12 without their parents (there should be someone the question "why" answer), and those who have not seen the first part.

A few weeks ago I asked my piano teacher, which is older than I am only 10 years, as it relates to one of my favorite movies – Pirates of the Caribbean ". To my surprise, she replied: "I've never looked. And that, he deserves all the praise that I heard about him?" I have a few seconds, I changed my mind about the answer and then said simply: "Pirates of the Caribbean – a classic."

Yes, I did not dare say it – classic. This film, despite the fact that he was born relatively recently, has already entered the golden fund of world cinema. And not just because he has revived the pirate movie genre, but also because since the inception of cinema, no audience has not seen anything like it.

In "Pirates of the Caribbean" has absolutely everything that can boast of adventure: they adventure, intrigue, a fascinating plot, scale, spectacle, romance, fierce fights, car chases, humor, beautiful scenery and music, on which is breathtaking.

Gore Verbinski has created an amazing world that every kid dreams of, though he did not leave indifferent and little girls too. After all, life is a pirate – is primarily a freedom, but is there a man she does not appeal?

But this movie would have been the half was not as good without the genius of Johnny Depp. In his comments to the film 18-year-old Keira Knightley said: "He always pulls the blanket!" But it is quite natural, because it's his blanket! He – the center of the film, highlight it – the key to viewers' hearts. His inimitable gestures, demeanor, gestures, gait create a seamless and vivid image that he simply can not stock up at the memory. Johnny Depp plays the strange pirate so naturally, that begins to seem that he was Jack Sparrow in a past life. Still, after he had fashioned his hero, has thought his way to the last beads in her hair.

Of course, the rest of the cast pales against the backdrop of Depp. Worthy competition he could reach except that Geoffrey Rush and Barbossa, a pirate very different quenching. He is a classic buccaneer, not for nothing that his name is consonant with the names of two world-famous pirates – with the names of red-bearded brothers Barborossoy Barborossoy I and II. If Trump Dppa – eccentricity, the trump Rush – charisma.

But saying that the rest of the actors is impressive less than Depp, I'm not in any way meant that they failed in their roles.

Orlando Bloom plays on average, but he helps his handsome appearance, so that William LTL quite convincing.

Keira Knightley – my favorite actress. But her game I like only the first part of the pirate trilogy. In the first movie she is good, although I do not sympathize with her character.

Secondary roles executed with great skill, was particularly impressed by the Commander Norington and pirate crew.

I note that in the first part of writers' work is best done, as in the plot no of strain or artificiality. Just can not remember a great dubbing that Russian visitors are pampered infrequently.

I would not be surprised if in 30 years will remove the remake of this movie, and I'll convince their grandchildren that the old version is much better and Johnny Depp – the only way Jack Sparrow.

This is one of those films that you watch over and over again many times. And when once again I close my battered box with almost erased drive to the holes, then going to the kitchen to a drunken gait, Centerfolds, involuntarily imitating the protagonist, and poured himself some coffee, sing: "So let us drink a glass, yo-ho!"

I confess, apocalyptic movies – my weakness. And not only mine, but quite a large number of moviegoers around the world. After another film on this theme in such large numbers just do not be filmed. And this weakness is not surprising. Always interesting to speculate: what if … But even more interesting: what then? .. How things will be next? In another world? .. But for me the more interesting in this situation: how humanity will start from scratch, from zero? .. How will re-appear civilization? .. Like this: from the ruins to build something new, especially knowing what were the ruins of the past … .

The film "Book of Eli" just shows us a post-apocalyptic world. World emphasized gray, dirty, and stressed the same. In this world there is no beauty, there is no purity and nobility. As beauty and colors of the world's gone forever, because all potentially high feelings are gone from the hearts of people. People here are angry dirty mass, which for some trinkets ready to kill. Of the senses – only greed and lust. The only people more or less sensitive, are the main character Eli, the main villain of the Carnegie Solara girl, her mother and several minor characters. Thus, the authors of them, as it were isolated from the gray crowd that inhabits the planet. And puts on it.

It is difficult to name any of the hero is clearly positive. Eli … Yes, he is such a stranger, but not a knight. It can, and there is nobility, but he restrains his diligent. His position – all that means nothing to intervene. Probably, it is true to such a world. But it is rather frightening, his heart slowly freezes. Not like all these gangsters, no … Eli sees a certain goal, he was accustomed to understand it so and not otherwise. And he goes to her, almost without noticing what is happening around them. He tries not to harm anyone. But the good he does. That is with him this book – and he carries it. And the guards. You do not even understand what is important is not the book itself, and its essence. For the time being does not understand …

But the main villain of the Carnegie just yet understood. He needed the book because of its content. He does not refer to it as a shrine. No, more like a thing in which power is concentrated, which can make him ruler over the world. And the book itself – the shell – it is not so interesting. Carnegie – not a very friendly character. And it shows, even when viewed from the perspective of his relationship to his wife (or, "his" woman). That seems to us that he loves her – with a tenderness he washes her head. And now – she was his hostage. When he is sincere, and when disingenuous – do not understand … You can say one thing – he is very, very uncommon man. He's smart, because only smart people could think of to a plan that Carnegie wants to implement. He has a dream, unlike most people, the survivors. The way this dream could bring trouble, but it is. No, this hero has not lost the human race, he became an animal.

Solara – a typical girl from the movies. To the best of the naive, to the extent of bold, moderately stubborn. Can not say that it does not have his own behalf, but to say that she is very expressive, too, is impossible. It is designed to wake up here in the sense of the protagonist. And make understand. And with this role she manages. And it is unlikely for this character needs something more.

In the description of the film Eli called wise … But is this true? .. It is clear that he can not represent wisdom as we used to see her: this here white-haired old man who utters some knotty question. No, Eli other. He was to some extent worldly wise. But it is not wise. He often sees the shell but not the essence. It should encourage him to understand. So, perhaps, in the category of wise heroes Eli record is not very true.

The only bright spot in this gray world of painting – the sea. It seemed represents the revival of life. It's here – as a hope the human race to salvation and new life.

Interestingly, in this film about the causes of the disaster say casually. And do not blame the people in it. Nuclear holocaust was not. Yes and no matter why the world changed, it is important that it became … The only thing the heroes of the accused that generation, is that it has lost faith. And the survivors are trying to restore confidence. She's here – the idea that can unite the live and return to them a human face. It would seem that quite a controversial idea, but in this picture, it is not imposed. There is no sense of propaganda.

Perhaps this film I liked. It has an atmosphere, there is peace on the topic which is interesting to speculate. There are heroes, which is typically not called. So that the picture turned out. I believe in this world.

7 of 10

How much can scare us crazy stories about the approaching end of the world? But most interesting is that history, or rather films the same. All the same a long time ago obezzhennaya us (the audience) story line, all the same characters: one is very good, the other already very bad, and certainly among the two of them will be those that will fall under the wing of a very good and very bad light.

In the cinema was half-heartedly, knowing that now I see "The Day After Tomorrow." And so it proved. Of course, these films make you think: "What are we doing? What is truth?" But each time, this "truth" is becoming more boring and ridiculous.

During the movie I did not feel pity, or to one of the heroes … simply do not have anybody. I knew 100% that good of course will be covered with laurels, and the bad will flounder overboard. Of course, I was worried about the heroes, when at every meter of waiting for them with all the new destructive force of the cataclysm.

In my opinion, the only plus of this film: that it is cleared. Beautiful picture, beautiful, powerful sound, which makes the jump, but it's just beautiful.

After the film with a sad smile on his face, I realized that once that happens, I am to die in water or a fire in their native expanses of Saratov. And sorry, to this day I still hoped for the best, speaking with irony.

7 of 10

Feat of the Spartans, of course, the fact historical. But I honestly do not particularly believe in such facts. To be honest, we can not be assured in the events of 100 years ago, not that such an antiquity.

To the credit of the director he became the tenth time to take on a historical film and try to meticulous researcher to reconstruct the ancient world. Was taken as a basis for a comic. And I think because of this, the film is largely won.

I will not argue that the clouds in the film exaggerated unrealistic picture of many aesthetes may seem monotonous, costume characters too impractical, and the film breathes pathos. If it were not for one thing. It is an art and a semantic value, which I think has been achieved at 100%. That arises when thinking of the heroism of the Spartans? Heroism? Absolutely. Patriotism? Of course. Courage and brotherly love? Not without it.

So all of this in the movie is. Do I need anything else? None. If you are looking for refurbished buildings on ancient figures of Sparta, replicas of weapons, forget about this movie. He breathes all emotions. He himself – one big lump of energy, focusing of masculinity in its pure form, courage and patriotism.

Someone has well said that the American comics of the twentieth century, there are myths of Ancient Greece of our time. At any age must have their heroes with super powers, to resist evil.

`300` if you are not a benchmark in the implementation of the myths on the screen, one of the best instances, of course. Like any myth, the heroes of an unusually beautiful (albeit drawn criticism for the press, I do not care), the nature of brightly responds to the experience of heroes, and evil characters are magnified, war elephants turn into nine-monster. Pathos? It does not cause disgust. He is here in his place. He is a conductor through the story, he had her rod.

Battles are really beautiful, they are bloody, I warn you, but each frame is bright and beads. After watching and want to put yourself something from this to the desktop.

But most of all, this film is worth seeing, in order to experience the power of the human spirit. When hundreds of wins a thousand, when a thousand wins tens of thousands. This is not a fairy tale. And this happened more than once in history.

So that's the movie about it. Thanks Snyder.

10 of 10

In Hollywood, shoot militants, as such, has become a rare thing. Often to the action component in the past strips mixed with some related genres, calculated to reach a wider audience, so more often in the annotations of films can be seen, rather, the sonorous name of "crime thriller" or at worst "a comedy / fantasy thriller." It seems to me from the last hit the screens, only the "Expendables" can be called almost "pure" fighter without impurities. Went to this movie with some caution, since the brutal and charismatic Jason Statham is often mistaken in the choice of projects, often performing in explicit weak scenes. At this time, in my purely personal opinion, he did not miss, starring in this sturdy action, which I can confidently call a pure representative of the genre. Let the familiar image of the silent killer Statham is not retired, yet look at what is happening on the screen I was very interested.

The plot is, of course, does not shine, and do not deal in it. The main ingredients here are the actors and action, from the abundance of which I was delighted, coming out of the cinema hall. Rating: R pattern of perverted pleasure proekspluatirovala, showing the bloody shootings and brutal bout with a crunching of bones and knocking out teeth, which I personally was unspeakably happy, still indignant at what turned out bland "Die Hard 4" only because "Children under 13." As for the actors, Statham with impenetrable face of a steep and harsh guy looked excellent, good, this is his genre, and he shared it with anyone not want to as long legs and arms, in a variety of variations can give cuffs villains of all sizes. Ben Foster – a man of the day! An excellent dramatic actor Foster here appears as a psihopatichnogo, but who wants to learn the basics of killer-art boy who survived the death of his father, played by Donald Sutherland, and determined to avenge the murderer. What would I not seen the tapes of Foster I have never doubted his game. Appearing at least for ten minutes, at least for a half hour he was able to save almost any movie, incidentally, often beyond recognition, changing the characters of Foster becoming the main decoration of a movie.

As in any other picture in the "Mechanics" of the sample in 2011 has its flaws, and in particular, the camera work. It is not bad, but still in the moment of action, often, instead of lush images, allowing the full amount to enjoy what is happening, the operator of a twitch and chaotic manner, trying to capture the frame, thus blurring the focus of the viewer so that it becomes clear who wins the snowstorm. On the plot holes are not going to focus, because in this genre are not important, although their presence can not deny.

As a result, ideal for relaxing after a hard day. Tough thriller with good acting, mass shootings, car chases and explosions. Prior to the masterpieces of the genre does not hold, but for the most part excellent entertaining movie for me to become a first trip to the cinema in the New Year.

7 of 10

Ehh, "throne", "throne" … Why are you all not turned out like your first 50 minutes. To me you were on the waiting list at the first place, along with the "beginning." And you're short of expectations. I'm looking forward, instantly plunged into the film, but after we get into the cyberworld, and they begin fighting and megauletnye race I just stuck! It was awesome! But how to insert and released. Once Sam meets a father and he explains it all, the beginning of smell slightly sifachnostyu. Immediately there was a lot of questions that do not provide answers. For example, even the simplest of everyday life, where there books and food, this is the cyber world! All the super action sniklo, started some kind of fuss, it was boring … By the end, of course, everything has increased, but it was not that.

Visual component of the film simply amazing. All this style captivated me ever since the trailer. This whole universe is a cold neon me stunned. Especially want to single out a dizzying race with amazing light trails.

Of the actors, the main concerns I had about Garrett Hedlund, but in my opinion, he was the best in the film. He coped well with everything and look harmonious. But the image of Olivia Wilde disappointed, not that she played badly, just that I expected to see a sexy warrior cyberworld, and saw similar to Leeloo from "Fifth element" girl. Jeff Bridges, it's Jeff Bridges and any comments to it can not be it. But then again disappoint the image, some Jedi Favorites with the manners of the "Matrix".

In general, the script, dialogues and images of heroes limping on one leg. Speak so generally, there is no concrete and clear explanations. In such a world, I think, without specifics anywhere. Done more than just a movie, do not have to strain to account for this and sorry. And personally for me, it was necessary to add rigidity and sexuality.

All naturally praise music, and for good reason! She was terrific. Daft Punk, long listen to them, they have cool music, unusual. A soundtrack to listen to the month before the show.

If we talk about 3D, then this is definitely the best show this year. It can be rather difficult, and to understand, but personally I liked it, gladly would look a second time.

In the process of writing the review I listened to the soundtrack to the "throne", inspired by the feelings of the first half of the movie, and I raised the estimate to one ball, so that:

9 of 10

Well, you and baobab

From the conversation between two aliens:

– Flew to the Earth! They say that life there is!
– Oh no! Vaughn, from our neighboring galaxy is flying … No, thank you. They are there with their hats in the truest sense of those words threw …

Plot based on such movies smoothly flat and linear: Orcs come from communist-gnomes-East versus Democrats, elves, goblins West, a squad of heavily armed heroes (preferably with no characters, and then not to get a "no ice"), Kojima will be a full two hours to become something of a scapegoat, and most (not best way – baaalshuyuyuyu) crowd of villains from the depths of space. Which of course, came not for tea, coffee, picnic area, but for a good purpose to wipe people off the face of the earth, so to finally Mother Nature to develop explanatory. But the little people on behalf of Mrs Democracy does not want to surrender, arrange brawl, resent the rudeness of extraterrestrial intruders, and zealously argue that "this is our land!". And dug corroded potststsreotizmom shouting "Hurrah!" (Okay even so …) disperse themselves to pieces, not sparing his stomach, defend their homeland. Commendable, m. .. m. .. m. ..

It would be foolish to expect from the "Battle of Los Angeles' gigantic stories with questionable tears and volvulus. At this time … Although it is not only "this time", and once again we face is flat, straight story from one end. Having decided a long time to chew so we are dealing, cannon fodder immediately thrown into prehensile feet of space brontozyabr. The entire film – it does not stop a team shooter. Feeling a computer game does not leave not for a moment – the ubiquitous piano scripts do not come overnight. Here one remove, then the second, but here are a helicopter sharahnim with wounded aboard.

The sweetest thing that a new tape of Jonathan Libesmana – ekshon, present here in all its glory. Literate shootings, explosions, shrapnel, someone lumps, terrible sound trills. In some places you can even shake (but only sometimes!), And in some places (and yes, that's so!) Will poperezhevat for idol. Celebrities, as usual in these films are written only in the beginning. And then they turn into a cluster of boats, whose goal chopped krakozyabrami and brontozyabr in the cabbage with the greatest zeal in zvedno and Stripes.

Characters over dialogue can laugh, not embarrassed of it. If the first half of the movie speech glavgeroev still handed down, then later when fastfudovsky potststsreotizm foolishness begins to shove out of the mouth of angry protagonists, a smile stretched from ear to ear without difficulty. Residents of Los Angeles should be glad that in the case of the reality of this situation, their carcasses will be as comely to defend, and the rest … can only lick one's lips …

You would not want the operator to include the vestibular apparatus? I wanted to. At first it seemed that "the style". But when meltesheniya were "close" the delicious moments of battle, and when talking characters and does wobble from side to side, one might feel that the film budget a penny, once hired a … m. .. m. .. m, "neuravnaveshennogo" operator.

Well, the rest in general, we have a fantastic patriotic cheer-shooter with excellent special effects, constant movement and quite a good design of the aliens (really not such a mindless copying in the same "Skyline"). The film is not a masterpiece, and not even a cult. Ordinary kinoshka, popkornovaya devoid of sensible story background, but designed for relaxation of the brain. Before viewing simply rely primarily on what is in front of you will be thriller. He will. Maybe it is not brilliant, but quite Godyaev for viewing in the cheerful company of friends.

7 of 10

If you would like to see a historical drama about the 2 nd World – this is not what you expected.

Movie Immortal bastards – this is another, and certainly one of the best, in my opinion, Tarantino's masterpieces. Everything here – the idea, and ways to implement the plan, such as music, choreography, image – a work of art.

Black, cynical humor and gratuitous cruelty, oh, yeah! All this is Quentin. It's like always original and unpredictable. You should not watch this film expecting dramatic, the tragic events of the 2 nd World War. The tragedy is, no doubt about it, but not what it used to see on movie screens. This is not Schindler's List "and" Valkyrie. " Tarantino seems to be saying
– I am a king and God at the site that I want is what you see on the screen, and no canons and laws of the genre I was not interference.

Actors chosen a point, and their task is really brilliant. Do not tell about all, but about the most distinguished.

Melanie Laurent –
New Tarantino muse? Quite possibly. She created a very vivid and real image, it made me hate her enemies as well as herself. Plus, her beauty and I am sure we will hear her name more than once as the star performer, and leading roles in better films.

Brad Pitt
At some point, I forgot that this handsome, the idol of millions of fans, Mr. Smith and Joe Black. It seemed to me that this is in truth the old hard-headed, utterly straightforward soldier, somewhere, even amusing, to see in its lifetime tens if not hundreds of deaths, which killed his own hands, and the last fire, water and copper pipes. And as he is cynical in this role!

Christoph Waltz.
This German actor certainly is very talented. The role of such a crazy freak, psycho, cleverest detective subtlest psychologist did not fit would probably be more than anyone I know of stars. It can make laugh like over a harmless joke, but a second later we see his cold, scratchy eyes and a smile slipping from his face instantly.

Well, of course, Til Schweiger.
I expected that he assigned more intense role, but still he in their place. I am every moment with his participation, expected him to anyone slay or kill. So gloomy and picturesque it as Sergeant Hugo Stiglitz.

My rating of this movie

10 of 10

although many people, I'm sure he will not like, but what to do, I am a passionate fan of Tarantino, and this time he outdid himself.

Here are gradually for me, and it's time to look sensational pictures of the past year. To begin with I was otsmotren resuscitated the classic Sherlock Holmes. Although, here it is necessary to make some amendment. World's most famous detective turned out not quite a classic, but more on that later. Who revived Mr. Holmes? Highly respected filmmaker in the world film industry Guy Ritchie took up the. And engaged not in vain, I must say. As soon as the picture came out in wide release here in Russia, I really wanted to see it, but somehow it all did not have time to go to the cinema and did not succeed. But other than watching movies at home no worse than in large halls. Home, you know, have time to think, ponder, weigh everything that happens and if necessary, rewind or even click on the pause.

For me, this picture was very welcome. Around all talked about this film, appeared numerous reviews, and reviews, but I did not try to listen and not read. Here, finally, I waited for the quality release tape, and only now I have allowed myself to get acquainted with the various reviews of the movie.

I think that will not properly compare the performance of Sherlock Holmes Robert Downey Jr.. and in the performance of Basil Livanova. Still, this is totally different characters with different characters. Yes, and the films of Guy Ritchie and Igor Maslennikov's quite different. Emphases were put on things that have a strict differentiation. So it is better not to compare. And anyway, those people who are addicted to Sherlock Holmes, should first read the original books and AK Doyle and his head to draw their own image, rather than rely on the vision of other individuals. When I watched the tape Richie, I deliberately turned off in my head all the memories of Soviet films.

In Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes to be very colorful characters, and what was supposed to be, in principle. Charming and attractive, witty, loyal friend, sometimes unkempt and greasy (but it's only temporary). But all these qualities are nothing without the most important thing. And most importantly Holmes? That's right, it's his intelligence, savvy, experience, application logic and methods of deduction. All further steps, actions of Sherlock initially planned to clear his head, and only then realized in life. Detective is important to first weigh everything and calculate. What about logic and deduction, so it's basically what Holmes uses every moment in life. And thanks to my experience, it generally can tell everything about any stranger, all terms and conditions of life. Of course, the basis for success of this character on screen laid actor Robert Downey Jr.. Robert is fully revealed the image of our hero's every effort.

The second character on the screen – a loyal friend and companion of Sherlock Holmes named Dr. Watson. Very pleased with the fact that Guy Ritchie bothered and made this character a full-fledged independent unit. Watson has no one could depend. This guy is party to the war in Afghanistan, has an excellent physical training and excellent knowledge in medicine, chemistry, etc. Watson would never abandon his friend Holmes, the doctor is ready at any minute to help his friend out of any difficult situation. In the creation and implementation of the image to fame bothered to another famous actor – Jude Law. And I must say that his work is also handled well.

I am glad that at last I fell into the hands of a detective in a long time. Suppose it's not too much, but it is. The detective, in my opinion, this is one of the most intelligent genre film. Gray cells are strained throughout the tape, and Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Watson and others kept secret until the end of the disclosure of the case.

Guy Ritchie has always been famous for its special atmosphere in the movies. Strictly speaking, the tape titled "Sherlock Holmes" in this context is also not podkachala. You and I clearly conveys the atmosphere of that very England, Victorian England. Used to some extent, the Gothic style. Dirty, rain-drenched streets. All around the puddles, mud, crowds of people, among whom, like regular people, and thieves of all stripes. Basements, bonfires, bins, home construction. In addition to all we are very fortunate that the composer of tape was chosen Hans Zimmer. Melodies fit perfectly into this atmosphere, carefully stressing it. Immediately noticeable excellent camera work. Something light, something totally dark picture gives a contrast to our perception.

Of course, we should admit that we face a new generation of Sherlock Holmes. This has already been widely discussed, but I can not keep silent about it. I hope that after this film rise in popularity among young people in the original books about Holmes AK Doyle. This is most useful, that can make such a tape.

Tape has managed to leave behind many memorable moments, moralistic. I believe that such films should watch everything – from small to large. But the elder, of course, I'm more than just be sure to adhere to this view that the classical Soviet Sherlock Holmes is better, but that's another conversation. Tape in addition to leave a large number of memorable phrases, which I (and not only me) will remember for a long time. For example: "Watson, you have a great gift of silence that makes you a wonderful companion," etc.

So, we'll have a very interesting adaptation of the classic with the original filing Guy Ritchie. I hope that will continue no less interesting. And I have become a thing continued to wait. You, too, is not it?